SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES ACT 1975
DETERMINATION ON THE REMUNERATION OF FULL-TIME SENIOR AND ORDINARY MEMBERS OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Section 6(1)(e) of the Salaries and Allowances Act 1975 (“the Act”) requires the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), at intervals of not more than twelve months, to enquire into and determine the remuneration to be paid to a person holding any office prescribed for this section.
In 2008, the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal aligned the timing of its determination on the remuneration of full-time Senior and Ordinary non-judicial Members of the State Administrative Tribunal (“Members”) with its report on the remuneration of judicial office holders under its jurisdiction.
The Tribunal has today issued a report under Section 7 of the Salaries and Allowances Act 1975 to the Minister recommending two adjustments of 3 per cent effective from 1 December 2009 and 1 July 2010 in the remuneration to be paid to Judges of the Supreme and District Courts, Masters of the Supreme Court, Magistrates and the Parliamentary Inspector of the Corruption and Crime Commission.
The Section 7 report is required to be laid before each House of Parliament within five sitting days of the House after its receipt by the Minister. Either House of Parliament, within 15 sitting days of that House after a copy of the report has been laid before it, may pass a resolution disapproving a recommendation made by the Tribunal.
This determination provides for the two remuneration increases of 3 per cent to flow through to the Members of the State Administrative Tribunal.
In discharging its statutory requirements with respect to the remuneration of Members, the Tribunal’s approach has been to:
- advertise for public submissions;
- write to key office holders; and
- consider relevant labour market and economic data.
This process provides an opportunity for members of the public, the Government, Members themselves or any other interested party to make a submission. It also helps to inform the Tribunal of changes which might have taken place in the roles or responsibilities of Members over the past year and other remuneration issues for Members.
Public submissions were sought by advertisement in The West Australian with a closing date of Friday, 25 September 2009.
Invitation to Office Holders
The Tribunal wrote to the President of the State Administrative Tribunal, inviting submissions to its enquiry.
Labour Market and Economic Data
Relevant labour market and economic data were sought from a variety of sources. For example, the Tribunal sought current data on the Wage Price Index, Average Weekly Earnings, the Consumer Price Index and Total Employment Growth. Economic forecasts at a national and state level were also considered.
In exercising its statutory responsibilities, the Tribunal applies broad principles upon which levels of remuneration are determined for all categories of offices and positions coming within the scope of the Salaries and Allowances Act 1975. These principles, particularised to Members of the State Administrative Tribunal, have been applied by the Tribunal to make judgements with respect to the remuneration in this determination. These principles are:
- the value of Members to the state and our democratic system of government;
- measures of the “work value” of Members; and
- the level of remuneration of Members within the context of the environment of wage and salary rates applying generally in the community.
The Tribunal received a letter from Justice John Chaney and a submission from MrMurray Allen, Senior Member and Mr Maurice Spilane, Ordinary Member on behalf of the Full-time Senior and Ordinary Members of the State Administrative Tribunal.
The submission sought an adjustment to the remuneration of Members “in line with any increase that may be granted to other judicial officers in Western Australia”.
The submission also requested clarification regarding issues around leave entitlements for Members. Justice Chaney stated “whether that is done by the Salaries and Allowances Tribunal, or by determination by the Governor under s119(1) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004, would not seem to much matter”.
A submission was also received from a member of the public suggesting no increase in the remuneration of Members.
The Tribunal has adjusted the remuneration of Members in line with the framework of rates payable to judicial office holders and court registrars in Western Australia. The adjustment has taken into account levels of remuneration in other relevant jurisdictions and maintains existing relativities.
In relation to the issue of leave entitlements, the Tribunal noted that under s119(4) of the State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004, the Governor may determine the leave of absence to which a non-judicial member is entitled and any other terms and conditions of service as a non-judicial member. The submission from the State Administrative Tribunal stated that the Governor had exercised this clause on one occasion before in the case of Mr James Jordan in 2005.
As the Governor has already determined the leave entitlements of one member, the Tribunal has decided that determination of such entitlements should properly remain with the Governor.
Motor Vehicle Entitlements
As was the case in previous determinations, the Tribunal has provided for Members to have an entitlement to a motor vehicle for private use under the conditions set out in the Schedule below.
The Tribunal determined that the amount payable to a Member who foregoes the entitlement of a Government supplied vehicle will increase from $23,000 per annum to $24,000 per annum to reflect increased motor vehicle leasing costs.
The Tribunal determines that the remuneration paid or provided to Senior and Ordinary Members of the State Administrative Tribunal will be as set out in the attached Schedule.
(effective from 1December 2009)
(effective from 1July 2010)
|Senior full-time member
|Ordinary full-time member
2. Motor Vehicles
In addition to the remuneration determined for the officers and persons holding offices listed in Part 1 of this Schedule, the office holders have an entitlement to a motor vehicle for private use provided through State Fleet in accordance with the criteria below.
Where a Benchmark Vehicle is sought through State Fleet, the entitlement is to a Ford Falcon G6E or a Holden Calais.
Where a vehicle and accessories other than a Benchmark Vehicle is sought through State Fleet, the difference in cost to Government:
- where greater, is to be paid fortnightly by the individual; or
- where lesser, is to be paid fortnightly as part of the individual’s remuneration.
The method of determining whether an additional contribution must be made by the individual or the surplus paid as part of remuneration shall be based on the actual cost to Government of the vehicle sought (using the formula detailed below), compared against the more expensive of the Benchmark Vehicles mentioned above. The cost at the time of entering into the lease is applicable.
Where an individual wishes to obtain a motor vehicle that varies from the Benchmark Vehicle, the motor vehicle costs must include the lease cost, Fringe Benefits Tax and all other operating costs based on the relevant figure of nominated kilometres to be travelled annually. The formula to be adopted in valuing the motor vehicle is:
L + R + aD + FBT, where
||Running cost per kilometre|
||nominated annual kilometres*|
||Fringe Benefits Tax|
*Note: To the extent that in line with State Fleet policy agencies may in practice already have adopted this approach (i.e. departed from the originally specified 20,000 km per annum calculation base) this is endorsed.
FBT is costed at applicable Australian Taxation Office rates as adjusted from time to time. Currently, FBT is costed at purchase price (inc GST) x Statutory fraction x Gross up (2.0647) x FBT rate (0.465).
Fringe Benefits Tax Exempt Agencies: Where an organisation is exempt from FBT in accordance with Commonwealth Government legislation, a notional amount equal to the standard FBT must be added to the cost of the benefit.
Should an officer choose other than a Benchmark Vehicle, it may have implications for the remuneration which is to be taken into account for their superannuation. Further information can be obtained from the Government Employees’ Superannuation Board’s Members’ Services Centre.
Non-chief executive officers who wish to vary from the Benchmark Vehicle must also obtain the approval of their chief executive officer for the make and model of vehicle required.
The cost of vehicle accessories over and above those available to Senior Executive Service members as set out in the “WA Government Fleet Policy and Guidelines” should be borne by the individual.
In most instances the Fleet Manager will provide a total costing for each vehicle.
Where a person elects not to be provided with a motor vehicle through State Fleet he/she is entitled to the cash value being paid fortnightly as additional remuneration. This option can only be accessed as a means of returning motor vehicles to the administering department at the expiration of a normal lease.
The cash value has been determined at $24,000 per annum.
The provision of vehicles remains an administrative responsibility of the Department to manage in a cost effective manner.
An individual accessing a vehicle under this Part shall take due care of the condition and security of the vehicle. This includes responsibility for ensuring the vehicle is regularly serviced and maintained at government expense according to the manufacturer’s recommended specifications, and making arrangements for off-street parking at home, whenever practicable, with appropriate security precautions taken at all times. Any theft or damage, however slight, should be reported to the Fleet Manager with a view to repairs being effected at the earliest opportunity.
While the vehicle may be used anywhere in Western Australia at no cost to the individual, if the vehicle is driven interstate, the individual is liable for the cost of fuel and oil while interstate. Furthermore, if used outside of Western Australia, the custodian must be in the vehicle at all times that it is being used.
Should the officer choose not to use the vehicle, supplied through State Fleet, for business, but allows and authorises the vehicle to be used for private use during business hours by another family member or person, he/she is not entitled to access another government vehicle for his/her private use.
Signed at Perth this 27th day of November 2009.
|W S Coleman AM
||C A Broadbent
||B J Moore|
SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES TRIBUNAL